This is the renowned author’s address to a debate on whether the Labour leader is ‘unfit to be prime minister’.

Read the peerless Howard Jacobson’s speech about Jeremy Corbyn and antisemitism

The Jewish Chronicle
September 9, 2018

Something tells me you’re expecting me to call Jeremy Corbyn an antisemite. There’s been a bit about it in the press, and I… well, you know…
But I’m not going to call him anything. He says he isn’t an antisemite, Hamas says he isn’t an antisemite, the white suprem­acist David Duke says he isn’t an antisemite, and that’s good enough for me.
Am I being ironical? Ladies and Gentlemen, I’m incapable of irony.
We know what an antisemite look like. He wears jackboots, a swastika arm-band, and shouts Juden Raus; Jeremy Corbyn wears a British Home Stores vest under his shirt and is softly spoken. Anti­semites accuse Jews of killing Jesus; Corbyn is an atheist and seems not to mind if we did or didn’t. Whether that’s because Jesus was Jewish and killing him meant one less Jew in the world, is not for me to say. And – and – he doesn’t deny the Holocaust…
Mind you, he knows a man who does. In fact he knows a sur­pris­ing number of men who do. That he denies ever having been in their company – until pho­to­graphs turn up of him rubbing noses with them at the gravesides of mass murderers, offering to show them his belief systems if they’ll show him theirs – ‘Gosh, they’re the same size!’ – should come as no surprise. You can’t spend your whole life in the company of blood-libellers and holocaust-deniers and expect to remember them all by name.
If I may quote from Oscar Wilde’s missing play The Self-Import­ance of Being Jeremy- ‘To associate with one antisemite you don’t know to be antisemitic, Mr Corbyn, may be regarded as a mis­for­tune, to associate with anti­semites on a regular basis looks like a pre­dilec­tion.’
Look – when I think of the scoun­drels I’ve hung around with, I know how easy it is to get people wrong, even when they turn up to meet you wearing hoods and holding burning crosses. And Jeremy – is it OK if I call him Jeremy? – has never exactly been what you’d call observant.
Take that mural he cham­pioned, showing bankers playing Monopoly on the naked backs of the world’s oppressed. You and I, ladies and gentlemen, would look at those greedy, grasping, hooked-nosed, syph­il­it­ic, Zionistic fin­an­ci­ers and recognize them at once as straight out of the Julius Streicher I‑SPY BOOK OF JEWS. But so innocent of antisemitic cari­ca­ture is Jeremy, that he didn’t see anything remotely offensive. “I didn’t look closely,” he explained later. How many times does he have to say it, for God’s sake! I might have been there but I don’t think I was­in­volved. I don’t remember… I didn’t look closely.…
If this reminds you of those who lived downwind of the chimneys of Bergen Belsen claiming never to have smelt anything out of the ordinary, I say you have sus­pi­cious natures. Corbyn is a busy man. Busy men must take emotional shortcuts. There’s an image of a blood­suck­ing Jew. It’s identical to the image of the blood­suck­ing Jew I already carry in my head. Snap!
Could there, I wonder, be such a thing as an inad­vert­ent antisemite? Jeremy claims to be a peace-maker. A peace-maker brings warring parties together. Why then do we only ever see him taking Palestini­ans to tea? Could it be that he just can’t remember to ask the Israelis? “Oh, bugger, I’ve forgotten to invite the Jews again.”
Unless – perish the thought – it isn’t peace he wants after all, but the triumph of those he calls comrades and the destruc­tion of those he doesn’t.
According to his sup­port­ers, Jeremy Corbyn doesn’t have a racist bone in his body. Just a question, but what is racist bone and how do you know whether another person has one? There are 64 bones in the human arm alone. Can one be abso­lutely certain that Jeremy doesn’t feel even the tiniest twinge of bone ache, somewhere between the scapula and the humerus, when he sees an alien figure such as I am, coming towards him on Islington Green, carrying the collected speeches of Benjamin Disraeli and humming My Yiddishe Mama?
And what are we to make – speaking of Corbyn’s uncon­scious – of his inability ever to disavow antisemitism without reminding us of his lifelong oppos­i­tion to all forms of racism? Which is like answering the question ‘Are you a wife-beater?’ with an assurance that you always buy The Big Issue.
Because antisemitism isn’t quite a racism. It’s closer to a super­sti­tion: embedded in theology, shrouded in medieval irra­tion­al­ity, updated to suit leftist economics, and exhumed whenever a single explan­a­tion for all the evils of the world is sought. To talk of antisemitism as a racism is a con­tra­dic­tion in terms for Jeremy Corbyn, since in his eyes Jews are neither down­trod­den nor exploited but are – as usurers, colo­ni­al­ists and con­spir­at­ors – the very source and fount of racism them­selves. Once hold Jews to be racist, and Zionism a racist endeavour, then no antisemite can ever be a racist himself. And any defin­i­tion that says otherwise must be amended.
That’s the psy­cho­logy: now the science. Corbyn’s political life has been determ­ined by Newton’s First Law of Inertia which states that an object at rest will stay at rest, forever, as long as nothing pushes or pulls on it. In physics the something that might push or pull at it is another object in motion; in socialist politics it is a view con­tra­dict­ory to your own. Corbyn averts his face whenever he hears the word Jew, and rolls his eyes whenever he is asked a question, because he fears the chaos, otherwise known as a change of mind, that might ensue from accepting there’s another way of looking at the world.
I will spend my remaining seconds – I don’t mean in life, I mean of this speech – telling you why it matters to everyone, not just Jews, that a man so spiteful, sanc­ti­mo­ni­ous and obdurate should never be allowed to do to the country what he’s been doing to his party.
Those who revere Corbyn see it as a virtue that he has never changed his views. Mr Chairman, it is only a virtue to stay faithful to one’s vews if those views are worth staying faithful to.
To persist in a small erro­neous­ness is the mark of a fool. To persist in a great erro­neous­ness is the mark of a dangerous fool. The ideology in which Corbyn has been pickled for half a century was outworn by the time it reached him. It oversaw the death of millions. That the ideo­lo­gies he opposes have scarcely done any better is not an argument for his. You don’t have to love the West to refuse the embraces of those whose sole ambition is to blow the West apart … espe­cially if you want to call yourself a pacifist.
This should have been a golden summer for Labour. The nightmare that is Brexit, the hell that is Jacob Rees-Mogg, the out-of-season pantomime that is Boris Johnson – from all these Labour ought to have delivered us. But Corbyn did as much as anyone to make Brexit happen with his feeble non-support for Remaining – “I’m seven, erm, seven-and-a-half per cent in favour.”
That was one to get us to the bar­ri­cades. The wrong man – ladies and gentlemen – the wrong man at the wrong time espousing the wrong causes.
I am nothing if not fair: people who are limited in everything but the pleasure they take in them­selves are ten a penny in all political parties; they haunt the peri­pher­ies, like ghosts-of-the-Christ­mases-they-don’t-believe-in-past, backing losing causes, throwing tea parties for murderers, and looking saintly. Mr Corbyn’s mis­for­tune was to be lifted from those peri­pher­ies, and dumped haplessly in the centre.
Not just for our sake but for his, will someone please have pity and dump him back.
Howard Jacobson delivered this on September 6 in favour of the Motion – “Jeremy Corbyn is Unfit to be Prime Minister” – at a debate organised by Intel­li­gence Squared.
Image: Howard Jacobson (Source: Getty Images/The JC)