Joint ECAJ and ZFA statement on UN resolution calling for a ceasefire

Joint ECAJ and ZFA statement on UN resolution calling for a ceasefire

To down­load this state­ment in PDF for­mat, please click here.


The Exec­u­tive Coun­cil of Aus­tralian Jew­ry (ECAJ) and the Zion­ist Fed­er­a­tion of Aus­tralia (ZFA) are deeply con­cerned by the incon­sis­ten­cy in Australia’s deci­sion to vote in favour of a UN Gen­er­al Assem­bly res­o­lu­tion call­ing for a cease­fire short­ly after issu­ing a joint state­ment togeth­er with Cana­da and New Zealand that called for the removal and dis­man­tling of Hamas.

The joint state­ment con­demned Hamas’ heinous acts of vio­lence includ­ing sex­u­al vio­lence, the unac­cept­able treat­ment of hostages, and Hamas’ use of Pales­tin­ian civil­ians as human shields. It called for Hamas to lay down its arms and stip­u­lat­ed that there is no role for Hamas in the future gov­er­nance of Gaza.

We wel­come this posi­tion.

How­ev­er, the UN Gen­er­al Assem­bly res­o­lu­tion demands an imme­di­ate cease­fire, and does not call for Hamas to sur­ren­der or dis­arm.  It also implies that Hamas can some­how be defeat­ed with­out there being any large-scale impact on the civil­ian pop­u­la­tion, behind which Hamas delib­er­ate­ly hides.

We acknowl­edge the state­ment issued by the Aus­tralian Ambas­sador to the UN, H.E Mr James Larsen that refers to the call for a human­i­tar­i­an cease­fire as a call for more human­i­tar­i­an paus­es and the fact that Aus­tralia sup­port­ed the Unit­ed States’ attempt to unequiv­o­cal­ly con­demn Hamas for the 7 Octo­ber ter­ror­ist attacks.

How­ev­er, the fact that the res­o­lu­tion omit­ted these crit­i­cal issues and appears to call for a cease­fire should have been enough of a rea­son to vote with Australia’s clos­est ally, the Unit­ed States and oppose this res­o­lu­tion.

The deci­sion to vote in favour of this res­o­lu­tion has cre­at­ed uncer­tain­ty and con­fu­sion and is a depar­ture from the clear­ly prin­ci­pled posi­tion that Aus­tralia adopt­ed fol­low­ing Hamas’ attack on 7 Octo­ber.

The Aus­tralian Gov­ern­ment can­not have it both ways. Either it stands by its posi­tion in the joint state­ment that recog­nis­es that Hamas must be removed from pow­er and return all the hostages or it sup­ports a cease­fire which would allow Hamas to remain in pow­er and deliv­er on its promise to repeat the attacks of 7 Octo­ber at the ear­li­est pos­si­ble oppor­tu­ni­ty.

Sin­cere­ly,

Daniel Aghion KC, Pres­i­dent Exec­u­tive Coun­cil of Aus­tralian Jew­ry

Jere­my Leibler, Pres­i­dent, Zion­ist Fed­er­a­tion of Aus­tralia

Submission

Redefining terrorism

ECAJ’s sub­mis­sion on the review of the def­i­n­i­tion of a ‘ter­ror­ist act’ in sec­tion 100.1 of the Crim­i­nal Code Act 1995.

Read More »

Help us improve

Thanks for visting our website today. Can you spare a minute to give us feedback on our website? We're always looking for ways to improve our site.

Did you find what you came here for today?
How likely are you to recommend this website to a friend or colleague? On a scale from 0 (least likely) to 10 (most likely).
0 is least likely; 10 is most likely.
Subscribe pop-up tile

Stay up to date with a weekly newsletter and breaking news updates from the ECAJ, the voice of the Australian Jewish community.

Name