ECAJ Media Statement: The Voice Referendum

ECAJ Media Statement: The Voice Referendum

To download this statement in PDF format, please click here.


Elected Coun­cil­lors of the Executive Council of Aus­trali­an Jewry (ECAJ), the peak rep­res­ent­at­ive body of the Aus­trali­an Jewish community, have voted over­whelm­ingly to support a Yes vote in the upcoming ref­er­en­dum to decide whether to alter the Aus­trali­an Con­sti­tu­tion to establish an Abori­gin­al and Torres Strait Islander Voice to make rep­res­ent­a­tions to Par­lia­ment and the Executive Gov­ern­ment on matters relating to Abori­gin­al and Torres Strait Islander peoples.

“The ECAJ was one of the first groups to support the 2017 Uluru Statement from the Heart in which Australia’s Abori­gin­al and Torres Strait Islander peoples called for con­sti­tu­tion­al recog­ni­tion of their status as Australia’s First Nations and for a con­sti­tu­tion­ally guar­an­teed First Nations Voice”, said ECAJ President, Jillian Segal.

“There is a clear moral imper­at­ive for con­sti­tu­tion­al recog­ni­tion of Australia’s First Nations”, Ms Segal said. “We recognise that there is a range of views in the Jewish community, as in the wider community, about the merits and effect­ive­ness of a Voice. People have also expressed different expect­a­tions about the scope of matters in relation to which the Voice may make rep­res­ent­a­tions, and the way it will operate and be con­sti­tuted, but these details will be decided by the par­lia­ment, and will thus be amenable to legis­lat­ive change in the future, if necessary.”

“With respect for all differing opinions, ECAJ Coun­cil­lors have nev­er­the­less voted to support the ref­er­en­dum to amend the Con­sti­tu­tion as an historic step towards justice and recon­cili­ation.”

Ms Segal noted the debate about the Voice has tran­scen­ded political and cultural divides. “Many mul­ti­cul­tur­al and faith com­munit­ies which usually align with different sides of the political spectrum have united to support a clear majority, even though not all, of Australia’s First Nations people, in backing the ref­er­en­dum”, Ms Segal said.

She also referred to “intem­per­ate and inac­cur­ate state­ments made by some of the parties sup­port­ing each of the ref­er­en­dum Yes and No cases, which have created discord and unne­ces­sary division within Aus­trali­an society”.

“We have called on all par­ti­cipants in the ref­er­en­dum campaign to conduct the debate on this historic issue in a fair, informed and dignified manner, as befits our great democracy.”

Contact
Peter Wertheim AM | Co-CEO
ph: 02 8353 8505 | m: 0408 160 904 | fax: 02 9361 5888
e: [email protected] | www.ecaj.org.au

What you need to know about the Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion.

What you need to know about the Combatting Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism (Criminal and Migration Laws) Act 2026 passed in the wake of the Bondi Beach attack.

ECAJ submission to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security review

ECAJ statement on the attack on a rally in Perth.

Help us improve

Thanks for visting our website today. Can you spare a minute to give us feedback on our website? We're always looking for ways to improve our site.

Did you find what you came here for today?
How likely are you to recommend this website to a friend or colleague? On a scale from 0 (least likely) to 10 (most likely).
0 is least likely; 10 is most likely.
Subscribe pop-up tile

Stay up to date with a weekly newsletter and breaking news updates from the ECAJ, the voice of the Australian Jewish community.

Name