Jones v Scully FCA 1080

Jones v Scully FCA 1080

Brief outline from the FAC report:

1 On 21 September 2000 the Human Rights & Equal Oppor­tun­ity Com­mis­sion (“the HREOC”) determ­ined that Mrs Olga Scully had engaged in conduct rendered unlawful by Part IIA of the Racial Dis­crim­in­a­tion Act (1975) (Cth) (“the RDA”) by “dis­trib­ut­ing anti-Semitic lit­er­at­ure in letter boxes in Launce­st­on, Tasmania, and by selling or offering to sell such lit­er­at­ure at a public market in Launce­st­on”. The HREOC made declar­a­tions that Mrs Scully should not repeat or continue the unlawful conduct and that she should apologise for her unlawful conduct by writing a letter of apology to the com­plain­ants in the terms specified in the decision.

Jones v Scully [2002] FCA 1080

Witness evidence from each day of the Royal Commission.

Royal Commissioner Virginia Bell has slammed social media attacks on witnesses after they've given testimony.

ECAJ condemns Itamar Ben Gvir overtreatment of anti-Israel activists

Help us improve

Thanks for visting our website today. Can you spare a minute to give us feedback on our website? We're always looking for ways to improve our site.

Did you find what you came here for today?
How likely are you to recommend this website to a friend or colleague? On a scale from 0 (least likely) to 10 (most likely).
0 is least likely; 10 is most likely.
Subscribe pop-up tile

Stay up to date with a weekly newsletter and breaking news updates from the ECAJ, the voice of the Australian Jewish community.

Name