Labor has failed to explain how Palestinian Authority can be a partner in peace

Labor has failed to explain how Palestinian Authority can be a partner in peace

Commentary from co-CEO Alex Ryvchin originally published in The Australian on 12 August 2025.

The gov­ern­ment has final­ly end­ed years of debate about Pales­tin­ian state­hood to announce that at the Unit­ed Nations Gen­er­al Assem­bly next month, Aus­tralia will recog­nise Pales­tine.

For­eign Min­is­ter Pen­ny Wong spoke of it as a piece of unfin­ished busi­ness. Aus­tralia recog­nised ­Israel when it declared state­hood in 1948, pur­suant to the UN’s ­par­ti­tion plan endorsed by a ­major­i­ty of states, includ­ing, ­cru­cial­ly, rival super­pow­ers, the Sovi­et Union and the Unit­ed States. It is high time to fin­ish the work the UN start­ed and acknowl­edge a Pales­tin­ian state along­side the Jew­ish one.

Only there’s a hitch. The rea­son why Pales­tine wasn’t cre­at­ed in 1948 wasn’t because of oppo­si­tion to it. It wasn’t because of set­tler vio­lence or Ben­jamin Netanyahu’s hard line or a cri­sis in Gaza.

It was because the Pales­tini­ans reject­ed it because accept­ing it would mean per­ma­nent­ly entrench­ing a Jew­ish state in the Mid­dle East.

Instead, they wagered on civ­il war but­tressed by the Arab world, which duti­ful­ly invad­ed the Jew­ish state.

Israel wasn’t recog­nised by the world as a gift bestowed upon the Jew­ish peo­ple.

It was recog­nised because it had attained state­hood by virtue of care­ful­ly build­ing the com­po­nents of a viable, demo­c­ra­t­ic state – a free press, a mul­ti-par­ty polit­i­cal sys­tem, a vibrant civ­il soci­ety, ­organ­ised labour, indus­try and free mar­kets.

The world mere­ly recog­nised a real­i­ty that had come to pass.

This is what has allowed it to sus­tain and thrive through incom­pa­ra­ble adver­si­ty.

Have the Pales­tini­ans built the essen­tial com­po­nents of a viable state capa­ble of with­stand­ing ­jihadist forces, Iran and the ­com­pet­ing tribes and fac­tions that will be sali­vat­ing at the prospect of claim­ing Pales­tine as a stag­ing ground for the final ­destruc­tion of Israel?

Aus­tralia is now com­mit­ted to recog­nis­ing as a state some­thing with no agreed bor­ders, no sin­gle gov­ern­ment in effec­tive con­trol of its ter­ri­to­ry, and no capac­i­ty to live in peace with its neigh­bours.

In doing so, Aus­tralia has aban­doned decades of bipar­ti­san ­con­sen­sus which has envis­aged Pales­tin­ian state­hood and recog­ni­tion as part of a com­pre­hen­sive peace agree­ment between Israel, the Pales­tini­ans and the Arab states.

The Prime Min­is­ter spoke com­pelling­ly of the evils of Hamas, its crimes against Israelis and its own peo­ple, and the fact that its days of gov­ern­ing are over. All well and good.

But who will now fin­ish the mis­sion of root­ing out Hamas in Gaza or stop­ping it from dom­i­nat­ing in the West Bank? The Pales­tin­ian Author­i­ty? Inter­na­tion­al peace­keep­ers? Only Israel has shown the will­ing­ness and abil­i­ty to con­front Hamas.

The com­mit­ments made by the Pales­tin­ian Author­i­ty to live in peace, demil­i­tarise and engage in wide­spread reforms are a good start. But con­di­tions that can­not or will not be enforced are mean­ing­less.

Antho­ny Albanese and the For­eign Min­is­ter failed to clear­ly artic­u­late how the com­mit­ments made by the Pales­tin­ian Author­i­ty will be enforced and the con­se­quences if they fail.

This announce­ment removes any incen­tive or diplo­mat­ic pres­sure for the Pales­tini­ans to do the things that have always stood in the way of end­ing the con­flict, specif­i­cal­ly the recog­ni­tion of ­Israel as a Jew­ish state and the need to nego­ti­ate the five final sta­tus issues that sep­a­rate the sides.

Israel will feel wronged and aban­doned by a long­stand­ing ally.

The Pales­tin­ian Author­i­ty will feel that a huge diplo­mat­ic prize has been dropped in its lap, despite its con­sis­tent fail­ures to reform, democ­ra­tise and agree to peace­ful coex­is­tence along­side a Jew­ish state.

Hamas and oth­er Islamist groups will see that bar­bar­i­ty on a grand scale can lead to desired polit­i­cal trans­for­ma­tion.

While we believe that the gov­ern­ment sin­cere­ly believes in a two-state solu­tion and that these moves will help achieve it, we fear that its actions, intend­ed to side­line extrem­ists, will have the exact oppo­site effect.

It will encour­age Hamas to keep fight­ing and heap more ­mis­ery on its peo­ple, and it will ­invig­o­rate the most extreme ele­ments of the anti-Israel move­ment, those who have tar­get­ed elec­torate offices, gal­leries, Jew­ish fam­i­lies, indi­vid­u­als and din­ers in Mel­bourne alleys to esca­late their own activ­i­ties.

There is a sto­ry in Greek mythol­o­gy of Pro­crustes, who sought to fit trav­ellers into a bed by hack­ing or stretch­ing them into size, ­instead of adjust­ing the bed.

It is a para­ble for seek­ing to solve a prob­lem in the most absurd way, of lack­ing the right response to a prob­lem and muti­lat­ing one’s way to a solu­tion.

In its des­per­a­tion to ease our ­fatigue with this war and this con­flict, our gov­ern­ment has now pre­sent­ed its solu­tion. Except it is no solu­tion at all.

Mere­ly a guar­an­tee of more false dawns and the inevitable blood­shed that fol­lows them.

Help us improve

Thanks for visting our website today. We're always looking for ways to improve our site and understand your needs better.

Did you find what you came here for today?
On a scale from 0 to 10, how likely are you to recommend this website to a friend or colleague?
0 is least likely; 10 is most likely.
Subscribe pop-up tile

Stay up to date with email newsletters from the ECAJ, the voice of the Australian Jewish community.

Name