Racism is Not Free Speech

Racism is Not Free Speech

18th Novem­ber 2013

We have read with grow­ing con­cern that the Fed­er­al gov­ern­ment has plans to remove or water down the pro­tec­tions against racial vil­i­fi­ca­tion which present­ly extend to Aus­tralians of all back­grounds under the Racial Dis­crim­i­na­tion Act (RDA). This would be a step back­wards for Aus­tralia. We oppose absolute­ly any such change.
The pro­pos­al to change the RDA is being put for­ward in the name of free speech. Vil­i­fy­ing entire groups of peo­ple because of their race has noth­ing to do with free speech. To be vil­i­fied because of one’s eth­nic­i­ty or nation­al ori­gin hurts one’s abil­i­ty to par­tic­i­pate ful­ly in soci­ety.
Belong­ing to a racial­ly vil­i­fied group can under­mine and ulti­mate­ly destroy the sense of safe­ty and secu­ri­ty with which one goes about one’s dai­ly life. And, para­dox­i­cal­ly for free speech advo­cates, racial vil­i­fi­ca­tion can have a silenc­ing effect on those who are vil­i­fied. Racial vil­i­fi­ca­tion deprives its tar­gets of equal treat­ment and a fair go. This is what makes it un-Aus­tralian. Aus­tralia should not con­tem­plate going down the path of licens­ing racial vil­i­fi­ca­tion.
The cul­tur­al diver­si­ty of Australia’s peo­ple is a great source of our nation’s strength. It also impos­es an oblig­a­tion on gov­ern­ment to pro­tect and encour­age social cohe­sion. Fail­ure to do so can have very seri­ous if not cat­a­stroph­ic con­se­quences for our soci­ety. A change to the RDA would send a sig­nal that racism is accept­able.
Free­dom of speech is fun­da­men­tal to our lib­er­al demo­c­ra­t­ic soci­ety. But any right to free speech has its lim­its. For exam­ple, we have well-estab­lished laws against defama­tion, mis­lead­ing adver­tis­ing and the trans­mis­sion of offen­sive mate­r­i­al through the post. Free­dom does not mean the license of indi­vid­u­als to do just as they please because that would ulti­mate­ly result in the destruc­tion of free­dom. The RDA strikes a care­ful bal­ance between free­dom of expres­sion and free­dom from racial vil­i­fi­ca­tion.
We urge the Attor­ney-Gen­er­al to con­sult with us and oth­er stake­hold­er com­mu­ni­ties before any Bill is intro­duced into the Par­lia­ment.

Autho­rised by:
Les Malez­er and Kirstie Park­er, Co-chairs, Nation­al Con­gress of Australia’s First Peo­ples
Ran­da Kat­tan, CEO, Arab Coun­cil Aus­tralia
John Petropolous, Pres­i­dent, Aus­tralian Hel­lenic Coun­cil
Peter Wertheim, Exec­u­tive Direc­tor, Exec­u­tive Coun­cil of Aus­tralian Jew­ry
Patrick Voon, Pres­i­dent, Chi­nese Aus­tralian Forum
Samir Dan­dan, Pres­i­dent, Lebanese Mus­lim Asso­ci­a­tion
Vache H. Kara­men­ian, Exec­u­tive Direc­tor, Armen­ian Nation­al Coun­cil of Aus­tralia
Maha Krayem Abdo, Exec­u­tive Offi­cer, Unit­ed Mus­lim Women’s Asso­ci­a­tion
Priscil­la Brice-Weller, CEO, All Togeth­er Now

Help us improve

Thanks for visting our website today. Can you spare a minute to give us feedback on our website? We're always looking for ways to improve our site.

Did you find what you came here for today?
How likely are you to recommend this website to a friend or colleague? On a scale from 0 (least likely) to 10 (most likely).
0 is least likely; 10 is most likely.
Subscribe pop-up tile

Stay up to date with a weekly newsletter and breaking news updates from the ECAJ, the voice of the Australian Jewish community.

Name